Re: [patch 1/5] mm: remap_vmalloc_range

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Fri Apr 21 2006 - 03:33:21 EST


On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:17:12AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Add a remap_vmalloc_range and get rid of as many remap_pfn_range and
> > vm_insert_page loops as possible.
> >
> > remap_vmalloc_range can do a whole lot of nice range checking even
> > if the caller gets it wrong (which it looks like one or two do).
> >
> >
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHARED)) {
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHARED)) {
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHARED)) {
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHARED))
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHARED)) {
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHARED)) {
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHARED))
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHARED))
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, start, page + vma->vm_pgoff,
> > - PAGE_SIZE, vma->vm_page_prot))
> > - if (remap_pfn_range(vma, addr, pfn, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_READONLY))
>
> You've removed the ability for the caller to set the pte protections - it
> now always uses vma->vm_page_prot.
>
> please explain...

They should use vma->vm_page_prot?

The callers affected are the PAGE_SHARED ones (the others are unchanged).
Isn't it correct to provide readonly mappings if userspace asks for it?

I assumed this is why Linus went this way too with the new vm_insert_page
interface.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/