Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks

[James Morris]

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Alan Cox wrote:

> > something like AppArmour provides a much simpler security model for
> 
> If the AppArmour people care to submit their code upstream and get it
> merged then that would be a reason to keep LSM, if they don't then LSM
> (if they even want it..) can just become part of their patchkit instead.

This is the discussion we had a year ago, and have seen nothing 
upstream since.  I assume they do not intend to submit the code.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/