Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks

[David S. Miller]

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:33:19 +0100

> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:03:24PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > > fact for access control purposes is fundamentally flawed.  We're not going
> > > to add helpers or exports for it, I'd rather remove the ability to build
> > > lsm hook clients modular completely.
> > 
> > Or, better, remove LSM itself ;)
> 
> Seriously that makes a lot of sense.  All other modules people have come up
> with over the last years are irrelevant and/or broken by design.

I totally agree, let's get rid of LSM while we can.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/