Re: [PATCH] CONSOLE_LP_STRICT Kconfig option

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:03:30 +0100 Luca Falavigna wrote:

> Oops, I noticed I sent twice my email. Sorry.
> 
> 14 Feb 2006 15:59:56 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>:
> > This shouldn't be a CONFIG. This should be a runtime option.
> > It's ridiculous to have to recompile your kernel just to fix some
> > problem with your printer.
> >
> > e.g. sysctl, ioctl, sysfs entry, module parameter. Whatever is en
> > vogue these days. Easiest would be probably a module_param().
> 
> This feature only gets involved when passing console=lp0 parameter to
> the bootloader. I never tried to load a new system console while
> system was running so I'm not sure if it behaves correctly. If it
> does, I will modify this patch following your advices.

Andi's suggestion seems fine to me:  use a module_param() for
CONSOLE_LP_STRICT instead of a hidden build-time (non-Kconfig)
option.  Are you interested in making this change?

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/