Re: Userland swsusp failure (mm-related)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi,

On Saturday 08 April 2006 18:15, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > This is my first (and unique) failure since I began testing uswsusp
> > > (2.6.17-rc1 version). It happened (I think) because more than 50% of
> > > physical memory was occupied at suspend time (about 550 megs out og
> > > 1G) and that was what I was trying to test. After freeing some memory
> > > suspend worked (there was no need to reboot).
> > 
> > Well, it looks like we didn't free enough RAM for suspend in this case.
> > Unfortunately we were below the min watermark for ZONE_NORMAL and
> > we tried to allocate with GFP_ATOMIC (Nick, shouldn't we fall back to
> > ZONE_DMA in this case?).
> > 
> > I think we can safely ignore the watermarks in swsusp, so probably
> > we can set PF_MEMALLOC for the current task temporarily and reset
> > it when we have allocated memory.  Pavel, what do you think?
> 
> Seems little hacky but okay to me.
> 
> Should not fixing "how much to free" computation to free a bit more be
> enough to handle this?

Yes, but in that case we'll leave some memory unused. ;-)

Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/