Re: RT task scheduling

[Ingo Molnar]

* Bill Huey <billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > >>> You should consider for a moment to allow for the binding of a 
> > >>> thread to a CPU to determine the behavior of a SCHED_FIFO class task 
> > >>> instead of creating a new run category. [...]
> > 
> > with the observation that 1) binding is already possible [so your 
> > suggestion is apparently knocking on open doors] 2) binding is a 
> > separate mechanism (not adequate for all workloads) and it is thus 
> > orthogonal to what i'm trying to achieve with the "RT overload" stuff.  
> > Really simple and straightforward observations i think.

> First thing's first, SCHED_FIFO_GLOBAL for what you want in the main 
> line is the same thing as SCHED_FIFO in -rt, right ?

yes.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/