Re: which one is broken: VIA padlock aes or aes_i586?

[Michael Heyse]

Herbert Xu wrote:
> I don't think this patch is your problem since it's part of the multiblock
> code which doesn't exist in 2.6.12 at all.  Of course the multiblock code
> itself could be buggy.  I'll take a look.

You're right, this doesn't make sense. I tried it with 2.6.15.4, and it works, 2.6.16-rc1 doesn't. In both cases no other AES algorithm than padlock was compiled into the kernel. I hope this helps.

BTW: 2.6.15 gives me a read performance increase of about 50% (hdparm -t) compared to 2.6.12, nice work!!

Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/