Re: time patches by Roman Zippel

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sat Feb 18 2006 - 07:54:43 EST


Hi!

> So personally I'd suggest to consider that code base. Options are eiher
> 1) to optimize/streamline what you think is too ugly
> 2) make the whole NTP lcok calibration optional if you think it's computationally
> too heavy (however, both GNOME and KDE hit the CPU much more than any of these
> changes)

Well, being less resource-hungry is similar to be less lethal than loaded gun.

Kernel time keeping should better have <0.1% cpu overhead.
Pavel
--
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/