Re: [patch 0/6] lightweight robust futexes: -V3

[Ingo Molnar]

* Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:24 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Another thing I noticed was that futex_offset on the surface looks 
> > > like a malicious users dream variable .. [...]
> > 
> > i have no idea what you mean by that - could you explain whatever threat 
> > you have in mind, in more detail?
> 
> 	As I said, "on the surface" you could manipulate the 
> futex_offset to access memory unrelated to the futex structure . 
> That's all I'm referring too ..

and? You can 'manipulate' arbitrary userspace memory, be that used by 
the kernel or not, and you can do a sys_futex(FUTEX_WAKE) on any 
arbitrary userspace memory address too (this is a core property of 
futexes). You must have meant something specific when you said "on the 
surface looks like a malicious users dream variable". In other words: 
please move your statement out of innuendo by backing it up with 
specifics (or by retracting it) - right now it's hanging in the air :)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/