Re: SMP BUG

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Wed Feb 15 2006 - 22:27:54 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length"
Previous message: Paul Mackerras: "Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current ticklength"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: SMP BUG"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Linus Torvalds wrote:

So I like Rik's patch, but I don't feel _too_ strongly about it. The people who actually work on the scheduler should be the ones to sign off (or not) on it.

I thought it looked fine. As you say, the scheduler can't work (and
will blow up) if init_idle() isn't called before it is used.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length"
Previous message: Paul Mackerras: "Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current ticklength"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: SMP BUG"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]