RE: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller

[Suryanarayanan, Rajaram]

-----Original Message-----
From: KUROSAWA Takahiro [mailto:kurosawa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:28 AM
To: vatsa@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Suryanarayanan, Rajaram; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
ckrm-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; balbir.singh@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller

On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:08:52 +0530
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > It's not a forward port of the existing CPU resource controller 
> > but a new CPU resource controller for CKRM.  Its resource control
> > mechanism is different from that of the existing one.
> 
> Hmm ..I guess it depends on which version of CKRM you are referring
when
> you say "existing". When I replied earlier, I was referring to
f-series.
> f-series cpu controller is based on the patch you sent to lkml right?

Ah, I referred to the CKRM e- series controller as "existing controller"
and referred to the controller that I had sent as "a new CPU resource 
controller."

So, the controller that I had sent is the existing controller of
f- series.

Sorry for confusion,

-- 
KUROSAWA, Takahiro


Thanks for the clarification.
I was actually confused by the words "This patchset adds a CPU resource
controller for CKRM" in the earlier mail. I thought this is some new
controller..
Currently I have downloaded cpurc_v0.3-2614 and plan to look in to it
for understanding CKRM. Later I guess I can catch up with the current
changes that you are making..

Regards,
Rajaram Suryanarayanan | Team Lead | ES7000 Linux Systems Group    
Unisys Global Services -India | 
'Purva Premier', 135/1, Residency Road, | Bangalore - 560 025 |
+91-80-51594560
Do your best. Leave the rest to Linux.  	

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/