Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter

From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Tue Feb 14 2006 - 13:05:34 EST


>> >Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces?
>>
>> chownfn maybe. (fd + name)
>
>I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup.
>Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years.
>
This is not the cdrecord thread so Solaris is a no-go in this very one.



Thank you,
Jan Engelhardt
--
| Software Engineer and Linux/Unix Network Administrator
| Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/
| jengelh's site, http://jengelh.hopto.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/