Re: [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Feb 14 2006 - 02:42:09 EST



ok, lets go back to this one:

* Roman Zippel <zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Let's assume a get_time() which simply returns xtime and so has a
> resolution of around TICK_NSEC. This means the real time when one
> calls get_time() is somewhere between xtime and xtime+TICK_NSEC.
> Assuming the real time is xtime+TICK_NSEC-1, get_time() will return
> xtime and a relative timer with TICK_NSEC-1 will expire immediately.

i agree that on systems where get_time() has a TICK_NSEC resolution,
such short timeouts are bad.

i dont agree with the fix though: it penalizes platforms where
->get_time() resolution is sane.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/