Re: [PATCH 06/13] hrtimer: cleanup nanosleep

[Ingo Molnar]

* Roman Zippel <zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> nanosleep is the only user of the expired state, so let it manage this 
> itself, which makes the hrtimer code a bit simpler. The remaining time 
> is also only calculated if requested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

ok. (causes some churn in Thomas's -hrt queue, but we can then extend 
struct sleep_hrtimer, which is arguably cleaner.)

This is not for v2.6.16 though. (fine to me for -mm, and for 2.6.17)

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/