Re: [PATCH] matroxfb: simply return what i2c_add_driver() does

[Arthur Othieno]

On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
> 
> > insmod will tell us when the module failed to load. We do no further
> > processing on the return from i2c_add_driver(), so just return what
> > i2c_add_driver() did, instead of storing it.
> > 
> > Add __init/__exit annotations while we're at it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arthur Othieno <apgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Arthur, do you have such a device yourself? I have another cleanup
> patch for this driver and am looking for testers.
 
Unfortunately not ;( This was the last of i2c_add_driver() return audit
I had sitting around. I'm sure someone with said device will speak up..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/