Memory managment differences between 2.4 and 2.6 with mem=

[Serge Noiraud]

Hi,
	In 2.4 I used to have mem=2000 on a machine with 2GB of memory.
I used the differences between 2000 and 2048 for a specific driver. 
This means I use addresses between 0x7d000000 and 0x7fffffff.
I was sure the system did not take this memory.

In 2.6 it does not work like that.
In /proc/iomem the end of memory is 0x7d000000.
I think this is normal.
but I saw the IDE driver allocate 1KB in addresses between 0x7d000000 and 0x7d0003ff

	I have some question  :
Is it normal ?
If it is not, how to get the same functionality ? are there some new options ?
Does memap= can help ?
Is there any impact in the driver ?

I red mel gorman "Understanding the Linux Virtual Memory Manager", but it does not help me.
In which chapter this is explained ?

-- 
Serge Noiraud
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/