Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status

From: Philipp Matthias Hahn
Date: Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:24:16 EST


Hi!

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:04:22PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
...
> +void pm_set_ac_status(int (*ac_status_function)(void))
> +{
> + down(&pm_sem);
> + get_ac_status = ac_status_function;
> + up(&pm_sem);
> +}

Why do you need a semaphore/mutex, when you only do one assignment,
which is atomic by itself?

BYtE
Philipp
--
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Philipp Hahn
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ pmhahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/