Re: [RT] possible bug in trace_start_sched_wakeup

[Ingo Molnar]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  			trace_special_pid(sch.task->pid, sch.task->prio, p->prio);
> -		if (sch.task && (sch.task->prio >= p->prio))
> +		if (sch.task && ((sch.task->prio <= p->prio) || !rt_task(p)))
>  			sch.task = NULL;

this second condition i'd not change: it just expresses the rare case 
where a higher-prio task hits the CPU that we somehow did not start to 
trace. In that case we just zap the current trace.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/