Re: [PATCH 1/5] stack overflow safe kdump (2.6.16-rc1-i386) -safe_smp_processor_id

[Andrew Morton]

Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 08:10, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > It assumes that all x86 SMP machines have APICs.  That's untrue of Voyager.
> > I think we can probably live with this assumption - others would know
> > better than I.
> 
> Early x86s didn't have APICs and they are still often disabled on not so 
> old mobile CPUs.  I don't think it's a good assumption to make for i386.
> 

But how many of those do SMP?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/