Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction

From: Kyle Moffett
Date: Sun Jan 22 2006 - 20:56:00 EST


On Jan 22, 2006, at 20:25, Neil Brown wrote:
Changing the size of the devices is a separate operation that has been supported for a while. For each device in turn, you fail it and replace it with a larger device. (This means the array runs degraded for a while, which isn't ideal and might be fixed one day).

Once all the devices in the array are of the desired size, you run
mdadm --grow /dev/mdX --size=max
and the array (raid1, raid5, raid6) will use up all available space on the devices, and a resync will start to make sure that extra space is in-sync.

One option I can think of that would make it much safer would be to originally set up your RAID like this:

md3 (RAID-5)
__________/ | \__________
/ | \
md0 (RAID-1) md1 (RAID-1) md2 (RAID-1)

Each of md0-2 would only have a single drive, and therefore provide no redundancy. When you wanted to grow the RAID-5, you would first add a new larger disk to each of md0-md2 and trigger each resync. Once that is complete, remove the old drives from md0-2 and run:
mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --size=max
mdadm --grow /dev/md1 --size=max
mdadm --grow /dev/md2 --size=max

Then once all that has completed, run:
mdadm --grow /dev/md3 --size=max

This will enlarge the top-level array. If you have LVM on the top- level, you can allocate new LVs, resize existing ones, etc.

With the newly added code, you could also add new drives dynamically by creating a /dev/md4 out of the single drive, and adding that as a new member of /dev/md3.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

--
I lost interest in "blade servers" when I found they didn't throw knives at people who weren't supposed to be in your machine room.
-- Anthony de Boer


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/