Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver

[Gene Heskett]

On Saturday 21 January 2006 18:59, Doug McNaught wrote:
>Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>No, it's a different raw driver, for big databases that basically
>>> want their own custom filesystem on a disk.
>>
>> With the attendent possibility of rendering the whole thing
>> unrecoverably moot?
>>
>> OTOH, if this database actually does have a better way, and its
>> mature and proven, then I see no reason to cripple the database
>> people just to remove what is viewed as a potentially dangerous path
>> to the media surface for the unwashed to abuse.
>
>The database people have a newer and supported way to do that, via the
>O_DIRECT flag to open().  They aren't losing any functionality.
>
Good, but what about speed, is that impacted in any way they can 
measure, or is this flag/method actually faster than the raw driver is?

>-Doug

-- 
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules.  I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/