Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Michael Loftis]

--On January 20, 2006 5:35:51 PM +0100 Marc Koschewski 
<marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Moreover, as far as I remember... my devfsd -> udev transsition went as
> smooth as a reboot.

The one machine I've got running 2.6+devfs under debian chokes in initrd 
with an inability to find devfs during boot so I had to go back to static 
/dev entries for it since atleast in sarge right now I'm not seeing a 
quick-and-easy way to get devfs like support bundled via mkinitrd, but I 
haven't looked, and I shouldn't have to.  It shouldn't have gone away in a 
stable kernel in teh first place.  I realise things are changing, and need 
to change but that's called development, and belongs in a development tree.

> Marc



--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/