Re: [PATCH] SN2 user-MMIO CPU migration

From: Brent Casavant
Date: Fri Jan 20 2006 - 11:12:58 EST


On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> hm, why isnt the synchronization done in switch_to()? Your arch-level
> switch_to() could have something like thread->last_cpu_sync, and if
> thread->last_cpu_sync != this_cpu, do the flush. This would not only
> keep this stuff out of the generic scheduler, but it would also optimize
> things a bit more: the moment we do a set_task_cpu() it does not mean
> that CPU _will_ run the task. Another CPU could grab that task later on.

Very good points all around. I'll rework the changes in just the
manner you mentioned.

Brent

--
Brent Casavant All music is folk music. I ain't
bcasavan@xxxxxxx never heard a horse sing a song.
Silicon Graphics, Inc. -- Louis Armstrong
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/