Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386

[Jan Engelhardt]

>This patch is particularly useful for anybody booting a distro UP kernel
>on a multi-chassis IBM x440/x445, because that system requires APIC
>support to boot properly.  If booting a UP kernel on a large SMP machine
>seems silly, think of distro installer kernels. :)  Joe Flakybox can run
>his single-proc i386 box without APIC related breakage, and someone with
>a x445 enable APICs in the UP kernel long enough to install a proper SMP
>kernel.
>
>I know, it seems silly to be providing a patch that changes "enabled
>unless explicitly disabled" to "disabled unless explicitly enabled",
>especially since the APIC code can be forced off.  However, I _am_
>curious to hear what people think about the other parts of the patch.
>At the very least, I'm not quite convinced that noapic & nolapic are
>doing their jobs, because it seems to me that get_smp_config pokes the
>LAPIC and init_apic_mappings maps the IOAPICs into memory regardless of
>whatever flags are passed.  But, I'm not an APIC expert so I'll defer to
>anybody who knows more than I.  Most curiously, passing 'noapic nolapic'
>still yields things like this in dmesg:
>
>Questions?  Flames?  The asbestos underpants have been strapped on. :)

Do you think that people can't properly configure their bootloader to 
include "noapic nolapic" in the options?


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/