Re: [PATCH] pepoll_wait ...

[Ulrich Drepper]

Michael Tokarev wrote:
> How about epoll_pwait() instead?  It looks more appropriate, for
> my eyes anyway.  (Just a name, nothing more)

It's just a name but I have thought along the same lines. It's just more
pleasing.

-- 
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature