[PATCH] e1000 C style badness

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Wed Jan 18 2006 - 03:04:13 EST


Hi,

Recent e1000 updates introduced variable declarations after code. Fix
those up again.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index d0a5d16..ca68a04 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -2142,9 +2142,11 @@ e1000_leave_82542_rst(struct e1000_adapt
e1000_pci_set_mwi(&adapter->hw);

if(netif_running(netdev)) {
+ struct e1000_rx_ring *ring;
+
e1000_configure_rx(adapter);
/* No need to loop, because 82542 supports only 1 queue */
- struct e1000_rx_ring *ring = &adapter->rx_ring[0];
+ ring = &adapter->rx_ring[0];
adapter->alloc_rx_buf(adapter, ring, E1000_DESC_UNUSED(ring));
}
}
@@ -3583,8 +3585,8 @@ e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter
rx_desc = E1000_RX_DESC(*rx_ring, i);

while(rx_desc->status & E1000_RXD_STAT_DD) {
- buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
u8 status;
+ buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
#ifdef CONFIG_E1000_NAPI
if(*work_done >= work_to_do)
break;

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/