Re: [PATCH 0/3] changes about Call Trace:

[Akinobu Mita]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:22:11PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 16 January 2006 13:16, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> > If I'm missing something, please let me know.
> > 
> > a) On x86-64 we get different Call Trace format than other architectures
> >    when we get oops or press SysRq-t:
> > 
> >    <ffffffffa008ef6c>{:jbd:kjournald+1030}
> > 
> >    There is a architecture independent function print_symbol().
> >    How about using it on x86-64? But it changes to:
> > 
> >    [<ffffffffa008ef6c>] kjournald+0x406/0x578 [jbd]
> 
> The x86-64 format is more compact.

How about this update?

1/3: change from "[<...>]" to  "<...>".
2/3: change the format of offset from hexadecimal to decimal in.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/