Re: first bisection results in -mm3 [was: Re: 2.6.15-mm2: reiser3 oops on suspend and more (bonus oops shot!)]

[Mattia Dongili]

Hello,

sorry, it took me a while to come back to this issue.

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:01PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 23:08 +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > [cleaned up some Cc as this is not interesting to all MLs]
> > 
> > Andrew,
> > 
> > first bisection spotted the cause of the stalls at boot (happening while
> > starting portmap and after usb-storage scan):
> > 
> > time-clocksource-infrastructure.patch
> > time-generic-timekeeping-infrastructure.patch
> > time-i386-conversion-part-1-move-timer_pitc-to-i8253c.patch
> > time-i386-conversion-part-2-rework-tsc-support.patch
> > time-i386-conversion-part-3-enable-generic-timekeeping.patch
> > time-i386-conversion-part-4-remove-old-timer_opts-code.patch
> > time-i386-conversion-part-5-acpi-pm-variable-renaming-and-config-change.patch
> > time-i386-clocksource-drivers.patch
> > time-fix-cpu-frequency-detection.patch
> > 
> > Cc-ed john stultz
> > 
> > actually git bisect[1] pointed to time-fix-cpu-frequency-detection.patch
> > but it's clearly wrong. Reverting all the above patches (I suppose they
> > are somewhat related) fixes the stalls I experience. I can test
> > corrections if necessary.
> 
> Hmmm. I'm not quite understanding. Does reverting just
> time-fix-cpu-frequency-detection.patch change anything? I just sent out

no, that's why I reverted the full thing.

> a fix for an error case that patch, but I doubt you'd be hitting it.
> 
> Looking at the log here:
> http://oioio.altervista.org/linux/boot-2.6.15-mm2.3
> 
> I'm curious if you're getting cpufreq effects during interval while the
> TSC is being used as a clocksource before we switch to using the acpi_pm
> clocksource.

What should I expect? I didn't notice anything in particular and
actually the box stays alive for just a few minutes, then reiserfs
explodes so I have no chance to notice anything in the long run.

> After the system boots up, does it keep accurate time? Time doesn't
> obviously move too fast or to slow compared to a watch?

yes, during the short time it stays alive there's no difference between
my watch and my laptop.

> Few things to try (independently):
> 1. Does booting w/ idle=poll change the behavior?

yes, no more stalls

> 2. Does booting w/ clocksource=jiffies change the behavior?

yes, same as above

> 3. After booting up, run: 
>    echo tsc > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
>    And check that the system keeps accurate time.

didn't try as there seems to be no problem in timekeeping

thanks
-- 
mattia
:wq!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/