Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench

[Nick Piggin]

Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 14 January 2006 16:03, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > Ideally, balancing should be completely unaffected when all tasks are
> > of priority 0 which is what I thought yours did, and why I think the
> > current system is not great.
>
>
> The current smp nice in mainline 2.6.15 is performance neutral when all are 
> the same priority. It's only this improved version in -mm that is not.

Oh sure. I wasn't talking about performance though.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/