Re: [PATCH 2/5] rcu: don't check ->donelist in __rcu_pending()

[Oleg Nesterov]

Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:19:24PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > ->donelist becomes != NULL only in rcu_process_callbacks().
> >
> > rcu_process_callbacks() always calls rcu_do_batch() when
> > ->donelist != NULL.
> >
> > rcu_do_batch() schedules rcu_process_callbacks() again if
> > ->donelist was not flushed entirely.
> >
> > So ->donelist != NULL means that rcu_tasklet is either
> > TASKLET_STATE_SCHED or TASKLET_STATE_RUN, we don't need to
> > check it in __rcu_pending().
>
> Do I smell a bug wrt CPU Hotplug here? Basically, I see that we do
> a rcu_move_batch of ->curlist and ->nxtlist of the dead CPU. Why not
> ->donelist?

After the quick reading CPU Hotplug code I think you are right, there
is a bug in rcu_offline_cpu(). It should also move ->donelist, it is
lost otherwise.

>             If we have to do a rcu_move_batch of ->donelist also,
> then perhaps the ->donelist != NULL check is required in
> rcu_pending?

rcu_move_batch() always adds entries to the ->nxttail, so I think
this patch is correct.

>               This is considering that the RCU tasklet of the dead
> CPU is killed (rather than moved over to a different CPU).

Yes, it is killed explicitly in rcu_offline_cpu() via tasklet_kill_immediate().

Note that we can't remove this tasklet_kill_immediate() and rely on
takeover_tasklets(). rcu_process_callbacks() does __get_cpu_var(),
so it can't find orphaned rcu_data anyway if the tasklet was moved
to another cpu.

So, do we need something like this (untested, uncompiled) patch or not?

--- 2.6.15/kernel/rcupdate.c~	2006-01-09 20:23:32.000000000 +0300
+++ 2.6.15/kernel/rcupdate.c	2006-01-09 20:26:20.000000000 +0300
@@ -355,8 +355,9 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(struct rcu
 	spin_unlock_bh(&rcp->lock);
 	rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->curlist, rdp->curtail);
 	rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->nxtlist, rdp->nxttail);
-
+	rcu_move_batch(this_rdp, rdp->donelist, rdp->donetail);
 }
+
 static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *this_rdp = &get_cpu_var(rcu_data);

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/