Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency

[Eric Dumazet]

Andi Kleen a écrit :
> I always disliked the per chain spinlocks even for other hash tables like
> TCP/UDP multiplex - it would be much nicer to use a much smaller separately 
> hashed lock table and save cache. In this case the special case of using
> a one entry only lock hash table makes sense.

I agree, I do use a hashed spinlock array on my local tree for TCP, mainly to 
reduce the hash table size by a 2 factor.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/