Re: [RFC] Event counters [1/3]: Basic counter functionality

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Tue Jan 03 2006 - 08:21:03 EST


Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:11:46PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:


I guess I was hoping to try to keep it simple, and just have two
variants, the __ version would require the caller to do the locking.


I see - one point is that the two/three underscore versions make
it clear that preempt is required, though, but it might be a bit
over-complicated as you say.

Well, its up to you - please rearrange the patch as you wish and merge
up?


OK I will push it upstream - thanks!

We can revisit details again when some smoke clears from the
coming 2.6.16 merge cycle?

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/