Re: [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath - PathScale InfiniPath driver

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> 
> There are a few requested changes we have chosen to omit for now:
> 
>   - The driver still uses EXPORT_SYMBOL, for consistency with other
>     code in drivers/infiniband

Why would that matter?

>   - Someone asked for the kernel's i2c infrastructure to be used, but
>     our i2c usage is very specialised, and it would be more of a mess
>     to use the kernel's

Why is this?  What is so messy about the in-kernel i2c interfaces?
(yeah, I know that there are some oddities, just want to know what you
specifically are not liking...)

>   - We're still using ioctls instead of sysfs or configfs in some
>     cases, to maintain userspace compatibility

Compatibility with what?  The driver isn't in the kernel tree yet, so
there's no old kernel versions to remain compatibile with :)

I also noticed that you are still using the uint64_t type variable
types, can you please switch to the proper kernel types instead (u64 in
this specific example.)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/