Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional

From: Matt Mackall
Date: Thu Dec 29 2005 - 15:01:05 EST


On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:13:45PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > This adds configurable sysenter support on x86. This saves about 5k on
> > small systems.
>
> You not only remove the sysenter support but also the vdso. And the
> later is a very bad idea. It is already today basically impossible to
> have reliable backtraces without the vdso and the unwind info it
> contains for signal handlers. And things can only get worse in future.
> The magic heuristics in the compiler are not reliable. It's simply the
> wrong face, this in a interface between the kernel and the libc, the
> compiler should not have such knowledge.
>
> The vdso should be mandatory for all configurations.

It's under CONFIG_EMBEDDED. Think uclibc. Think systems without
interactive shells.

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/