Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers

[Ingo Molnar]

* Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > unit-at-a-time still increases the kernel stack footprint somewhat (by 
> > about 5% in the CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE case), but not by the insane degree 
> > gcc3 used to, which prompted the original -fno-unit-at-a-time addition.
> >...
> 
> Please hold off this patch.
> 
> I do already plan to look at this after the smoke has cleared after 
> the 4k stacks issue. I want to avoid two different knobs both with 
> negative effects on stack usage (currently CONFIG_4KSTACKS=y, and 
> after your patch gcc >= 4.0) giving a low testing coverage of the 
> worst cases.

this is obviously not 2.6.15 stuff, so we've got enough time to see the 
effects. [ And what does "I do plan to look at this" mean? When 
precisely, and can i thus go to other topics without the issue being 
dropped on the floor indefinitely? ]

also note that the inlining patch actually _reduces_ average stack 
footprint by ~3-4%:
                                            orig        +inlining
        # of functions above 256 bytes:      683              660
               total stackspace, bytes:   148492           142884

it is the unit-at-a-time patch that increases stack footprint (by about 
7-8%, which together with the inlining patch gives a net ~5%).

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/