Re: [PATCH] - Fix memory ordering problem in wake_futex()

[Jack Steiner]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:23:11PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Jack wrote:
> 
> >On IA64, locks are released using a "st.rel" instruction. This ensures that
> >preceding "stores" are visible before the lock is released but does NOT 
> >prevent
> >a "store" that follows the "st.rel" from becoming visible before the 
> >"st.rel".
> >The result is that the task that owns the futex_q continues prematurely. 
> >
> >The failure I saw is the task that owned the futex_q resumed prematurely 
> >and
> >was context-switch off of the cpu. The task's switch_stack occupied the 
> >same
> >space of the futex_q. The store to q->lock_ptr overwrote the ar.bspstore 
> >in the
> >switch_stack.
> >
> Bad race.
> Unfortuantely the scenario that you describe is quite frequent:
> - autoremove_wake_function()
> - ipc/sem.c (search for IN_WAKEUP)
> - ipc/msg.c appears to be correct, there are smp_wmb() calls.

Yuck. I agree - both of these look incorrect.

Also, I should have used smp_wmb(), not wmb(). Thanks for
pointing that out.

I wonder how many other spots have the same problem. IIRC, we ran into
similar problems in the tty driver a few years ago but I have not
seen any problems recently.

> 
> --
>    Manfred

-- 
Thanks

Jack Steiner (steiner@xxxxxxx)          651-683-5302
Principal Engineer                      SGI - Silicon Graphics, Inc.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/