Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers

[Bryan Henderson]

>>>Developer replies that the source code will be provided
>>>only to paying customers:
>> 
>> 
>> Not really.  Developer does make the bizarre statement that "paid 
>> customers" are entitled to source code, but doesn't say nobody else is. 

>> And Developer says at the same time he will make source code available 
to 
>> the person who requested it.  The problem is that he doesn't actually 
do 
>> it, and is never heard from again.
>
>Call me crazy but if one requests a copy of the source only to never 
>hear from the developer, is that not a direct violation of the GPL?  To 
>me this sounds like the developer is walking a pretty fine line.

I'll just call you crazy for implying that someone said otherwise.

If you look above, you'll see a statement that the developer said he would 
supply source code only to paying customers, and then a contradiction that 
says the developer did not say that.  It then adds an extra fact to 
explain what the developer _really_ did to create the violation.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/