Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> In other words: if people didn't mix up issues that had nothing to do with
> this into it, I'd be happier. I've already said that a mutex that does
> _not_ replace semaphore (and doesn't mess with naming) is acceptable.
>

At least I'm very happy with Linus' decision.  Can we now end this thread,
and move forward.  You may bring up your issues in what comes next.

Thank you,

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/