Re: [patch 0/5] RNG cleanup & new drivers attempt #1

[Deepak Saxena]

On Oct 19 2005, at 11:01, Jeff Garzik was caught saying:
> Not interesting in pursuing this path.  This has been discussed 
> endlessly, check the archives.
> 
> We want the FIPS tests.  Hardware (especially cheap hardware) is often 
> known to go haywire.  Trusting hardware to do the FIPS tests is pretty 
> silly, since you're trusting the piece that might go haywire to tell you 
> its OK.  RNGs have a history of suddenly providing non-random data, for 
> a variety of reasons (usually poor board wiring).
> 
> We also want the userspace daemon because that gives the sysadmin far 
> more control over how much entropy is added to the system.  99.9% of the 
> cases in the real world, we don't want the RNG pumping entropy into the 
> pool at full speed.  That will likely pump in more data than a system 
> needs, chewing CPU.  The admin can't even kill the daemon to reclaim his 
> CPU, if its all in-kernel.

OK, understood. But other than the fastpath idea, are you OK with 
the direction I took with the code?

~Deepak

-- 
Deepak Saxena - dsaxena@xxxxxxxxxxx - http://www.plexity.net

When law and duty are one, united by religion, you never become fully
conscious, fully aware of yourself. You are always a little less than
an individual. - Frank Herbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/