Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] It will waste my time, I could spend on other projects and it 
> >  > will put Andrew in the unfortunate position to decide, which patch to 
> >  > accept. [...]
> > 
> >  yes, please, put Andrew (and me too) into that unfortunate position!  
> >  Please, pretty please, get on with the patches!
> 
> I'm with Roman on this one - the old "show me the code" trick which 
> people use to quash other people's objections is rather poor form - we 
> should simply address the objections as raised.
> 
> That being said, I'll confess that I've largely ignored this 
> discussion in the hope that things would get sorted out.  Seems that 
> this won't be happening and as Roman's opinions carry weight I do 
> intend to solicit a (brief!) summary of his objections from him when 
> the patch comes round again.  Sorry.

Fine with me. A brief summary of technical objections (without any 
personal attacks) is all we wanted to have to begin with. "Show me the 
code" was my last-ditch attempt to move this seemingly unmovable 
discussion from a communication channel where the chemistry doesnt seem 
to work out to a more objective format.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/