Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx intothe kernel

[Luben Tuikov]

On 09/30/05 17:15, Andrew Patterson wrote:
>>Sorry but I completely fail to see this argument., locks it, then hangs.
>>
>>How will it "fail for most storage managament apps"?
> 
> 
> Let's see, one example:
> 
> Process A opens an attribute and writes to it.  Process B opens another
> attribute and writes to it, affecting the result that process A will see
> from its subsequent read. I suppose you could lock every attribute, but
> that would be very error-prone, and not allow much concurrency.

Why should synchronization between Process A and Process B 
reading storage attributes take place in the kernel?

They can synchronize in user space.

	Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/