Re: [RFC][PATCH] inline a few tiny functions in init/initramfs.c

[Nick Piggin]

On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 02:07 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> Ok, so it seems that there's agreement that the other two inlines in
> the patch makes sense, but the malloc() is not clear cut.
> 
> Since this is in initramfs after all it doesn't make that big a
> difference overall, so I'll just send in a patch that inlines the
> other two functions but leaves malloc() alone.
> 

Well, they're not particularly performance critical, and everything
is marked init anyway so I don't know why you would bother changing
anything ;)

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.



Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/