Re: ADI Blackfin porting for kernel-2.6.13

[Robert Schwebel]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:37:59AM +0800, Luke Yang wrote:
> We really don't have plan about Blackfin with a MMU now. So do you
> beleve it is necessary to change the name to arch/blackfin?

Hmm, as far as I know there are at least plans for variants with memory
protection units (but without virtual addressing), but anyway - why put
the mmu into the architecture name? If you use "blackfin" you are open
to everything and no non dsp guru has to guess what bf might be ;) 

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/