On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:38:26PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:ok, ok, but isn't this a little bit racy (so you can see dev_name and line, then another driver's info and then " at ", then something else...)
Alon Bar-Lev napsal(a):
static inline voidplus sign between that?
uart_report_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)
{
- printk("%s%d", drv->dev_name, port->line);
+ printk(KERN_INFO + "%s%d", drv->dev_name, port->line);
printk(" at ");why the fellows didn't put this to the line above?
switch (port->iotype) {And what about these?
case UPIO_PORT:
printk("I/O 0x%x", port->iobase);
looks like they're not on a newline, so need no severity.