Re: [patch 18/39] remap_file_pages protection support: add VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV

From: Russell King
Date: Mon Aug 15 2005 - 05:16:13 EST


On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:12:54PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Well there is now, and that is we are now using a bit in the 2nd
> byte as flags. So I had to do away with -ve numbers there entirely.
>
> You could achieve a similar thing by using another bit in that byte
> #define VM_FAULT_FAILED 0x20
> and make that bit present in VM_FAULT_OOM and VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, then
> do an unlikely test for that bit in your handler and branch away to
> the slow path.

That'll do as well, thanks.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/