Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affectsa_mask

[Steven Rostedt]

Two more systems that are different from Linux.

So far, Linux is the odd ball out.

-- Steve


On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 22:28 +0100, someone else wrote: 
> 
> SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
> 
> sa_mask blocks other signals
> SA_NODEFER does not block other signals
> SA_NODEFER does not affect sa_mask
> SA_NODEFER and sa_mask blocks sig
> !SA_NODEFER blocks sig
> SA_NODEFER does not block sig
> sa_mask blocks sig
> 
> 
> OSF1 hostname V5.1 2650 alpha
> 
> sa_mask blocks other signals
> SA_NODEFER does not block other signals
> SA_NODEFER does not affect sa_mask
> SA_NODEFER and sa_mask blocks sig
> !SA_NODEFER blocks sig
> SA_NODEFER does not block sig
> sa_mask blocks sig
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/