Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask

[Jesper Juhl]

On 8/12/05, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Jan Engelhardt (jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > So, if in doubt what is really meant - check which of the two/three/+
> > > different behaviors the users out there favor most.
> >
> > Rather, check what happens in practice on other implementations.  I don't
> > have Solaris, HP-UX, Irix, AIX, etc. boxen at hand, but some folks must.
> >
> 
> I've supplied this before, but I'll send it again.  Attached is a program
> that should show the behavior of the sigaction.  If someone has one of the
> above mentioned boxes, please run this on the box and send back the
> results.
> 
I've got a 4-way pSeries p550 running AIX 5.3 here : 

$ uname -s -M -p -v -r
AIX 3 5 powerpc IBM,9113-550

Output from your program :

$ ./a.out
Unknown return code!!
Unknown return code!!
Unknown return code!!
Unknown return code!!
Unknown return code!!
Unknown return code!!
sa_mask blocks sig


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/