Re: [PATCH] latency logger for realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-30

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Aug 04 2005 - 08:53:37 EST



* Yang Yi <yang.yi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > looks pretty good! I'll look at merging your patch after KS/OLS.
>
> Do you have any trouble while you merge that latency logger patch?

i've merged it to the -52-11 patch that, and i've uploaded it a couple
of minutes ago.

i have done a number of cleanups on it - e.g. instead of latency logging
it's now called latency histogram, and i've also fixed a number of
coding style issues. Please double-check that it's still OK, seems to
work here.

would be nice to clean up the impact of the latency-histogram code some
more though: e.g. the #ifdef jungle check_critical_timing() is
disgusting. Could be cleaned up by always recording the latency_type
being currently traced into a new tr->latency_type field, and then using
that in check_critical_timing().

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/