Re: revert yenta free_irq on suspend

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > Also, as I said earlier, the better we support OSPM initiated power
> > management, the more likely APM will break.  This may be technically
> > unavoidable on some isolated boxes without quirks.  I agree with
> > Pavel that "do nothing" may make sense, but it seems some devices
> > may still need to be disabled by the OS.  As a real world example,
> > we currently can't turn off cardbus bridges because it breaks APM
> > on a couple of older laptops.
> 
> Won't freeing of IRQs cause problems with things like handhelds that
> actually rely on an interrupt to wake up ?

Well, you probably don't want to free IRQ that is used for wakeup; but
if driver is used for wakeup, it probably needs some special handling,
anyway (right?).
								Pavel
-- 
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/