Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Date: Fri Jul 22 2005 - 22:06:53 EST


In article <20050723125427.GA11177@rama> (at Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:54:27 -0400), Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> --- a/include/linux/netlink.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> #define NETLINK_IP6_FW 13
> #define NETLINK_DNRTMSG 14 /* DECnet routing messages */
> #define NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT 15 /* Kernel messages to userspace */
> -#define NETLINK_TAPBASE 16 /* 16 to 31 are ethertap */
> +#define NETLINK_W1 16 /* 16 to 31 are ethertap */
>
> #define MAX_LINKS 32
>

Comment says that 16-31 are used for ethertap.
So, probably assigh NETLINK_W1 at 32, and bump MAX_LINKS?

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/